Would it make sense to perform git rebase
while preserving the commit timestamps?
I believe a consequence would be that the new branch will not necessarily have commit dates chronologically. Is that theoretically possible at all? (e.g. using plumbing commands; just curious here)
If it is theoretically possible, then is it possible in practice with rebase, not to change the timestamps?
For example, assume I have the following tree:
master <jun 2010>
|
:
:
: oldbranch <feb 1984>
: /
oldcommit <jan 1984>
Now, if I rebase oldbranch
on master
, the date of the commit changes from feb 1984 to jun 2010. Is it possible to change that behaviour so that the commit timestamp is not changed? In the end I would thus obtain:
oldbranch <feb 1984>
/
master <jun 2010>
|
:
Would that make sense at all? Is it even allowed in git to have a history where an old commit has a more recent commit as a parent?